www.badpenguin.co.uk

JavaDKIM 1.0 Released

By TuxInvader, on 07-06-2009 18:04

Finally, after many months of doing other things, I have found some time to complete testing of JavaDKIM. I found a few remaining bugs (mostly in the simple canonicalisation code), and have fully tested it against Google Gmail. Everything seems to be working as it should, so this afternoon I have uploaded the source and binaries for JavaDKIM 1.0.

You may download the new binaries and/or source code from the usual place http://www.badpenguin.co.uk/dkim/and take it for a spin.

I tested the library using the test utilities found in the badpenguin.dkim.test package, and by using the library from a couple of ZXTM Java Extensions (signing outgoing mail to Google). The SignMail and VerifyMail utilities can be used to sign and verify emails found within text files, but they're aren't particularly useful in the real world. However they do demonstrate how the library is used.

I have been putting together a little SMTPproxy daemon which will be able to Sign and/or Verify mail which passes through it. I hope to release this soon. Shortly after the ZXTM Java Extensions are available.

JavaDKIM 1.0 Release Page

Cheers!

Last update : 07-06-2009 18:26

Users' Comments

Display 2 of 2 comments

[+] Expand comment

Code fix

By: Andre () on 16-08-2009 11:49

[-] Collapse comment

Code fix

By: Andre on 16-08-2009 11:49

Awesome work, thank you. Noticed a small bug in NSKey.java:

if ( ! tag[1].equals("DKIM1") )
dke = new DkimException(DkimError.KEYFAI L,"Unsupported DKIM version in txt record");
return;

There should be opening braces after the closing bracket of the if statement, to prevent the "return;" line from being called if it encounters a v=DKIM1 tag.

Cheers!

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

[+] Expand comment

Re: Code fix

By: Mark () on 23-08-2009 11:58

[-] Collapse comment

Re: Code fix

By: Mark on 23-08-2009 11:58

Thanks Andre.... I'll get that fixed.

Cheers,
Mark

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

Display 2 of 2 comments